(via thor2)

“Do what you love” disguises the fact that being able to choose a career primarily for personal reward is a privilege, a sign of socioeconomic class. Even if a self-employed graphic designer had parents who could pay for art school and co-sign a lease for a slick Brooklyn apartment, she can bestow DWYL as career advice upon those covetous of her success.

If we believe that working as a Silicon Valley entrepreneur or a museum publicist or a think-tank acolyte is essential to being true to ourselves, what do we believe about the inner lives and hopes of those who clean hotel rooms and stock shelves at big-box stores? The answer is: nothing.


Do what you love, love what you do: An omnipresent mantra that’s bad for work and workers. (via bakcwadrs)

a couple of other quotes from the article i really like:

According to this way of thinking, labor is not something one does for compensation but is an act of love. If profit doesn’t happen to follow, presumably it is because the worker’s passion and determination were insufficient. Its real achievement is making workers believe their labor serves the self and not the marketplace

and

Do what you love and you’ll never work a day in your life! Before succumbing to the intoxicating warmth of that promise, it’s critical to ask, “Who, exactly, benefits from making work feel like nonwork?” “Why should workers feel as if they aren’t working when they are?” In masking the very exploitative mechanisms of labor that it fuels, DWYL is, in fact, the most perfect ideological tool of capitalism. If we acknowledged all of our work as work, we could set appropriate limits for it, demanding fair compensation and humane schedules that allow for family and leisure time.

(via mercy-misrule)

I’ve reblogged this before but it will never stop speaking to my soul.

(via whineandbeer)

Fooling exploited people into thinking everything is just the way it should be is one of the most disturbing things about capitalism.

(via latinagabi)

Reblogging this so hard rn.

(via useyourwordsasher)

(via bellamyyoung)

lati-negros:

iwriteaboutfeminism:

Today, Ferguson is prepared to “keep it moving.”

September 28th

In face of the ordinance that mandated protestors not stand still while protesting, the community rode bikes #BlackBrilliance

(via multigrainqueerios)

“Human beings took our animal need for palatable food … and turned it into chocolate souffles with salted caramel cream. We took our ability to co-operate as a social species … and turned it into craft circles and bowling leagues and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. We took our capacity to make and use tools … and turned it into the Apollo moon landing. We took our uniquely precise ability to communicate through language … and turned it into King Lear.

None of these things are necessary for survival and reproduction. That is exactly what makes them so splendid. When we take our basic evolutionary wiring and transform it into something far beyond any prosaic matters of survival and reproduction … that’s when humanity is at its best. That’s when we show ourselves to be capable of creating meaning and joy, for ourselves and for one another. That’s when we’re most uniquely human.

And the same is true for sex. Human beings have a deep, hard-wired urge to replicate our DNA, instilled in us by millions of years of evolution. And we’ve turned it into an intense and delightful form of communication, intimacy, creativity, community, personal expression, transcendence, joy, pleasure, and love. Regardless of whether any DNA gets replicated in the process.

Why should we see this as sinful? What makes this any different from chocolate souffles and King Lear?”

Greta Christina (Sex and the Off-Label Use of Our Bodies) (via sexisnottheenemy) (via finkspiration) (via itswalky) (via rosalarian)

I don’t always agree with Greta Christina, but this is lovely.

let-them-eat-vag:

ashoutintothevoid:

Emma Sulkowicz is on the cover of this month’s New York Magazine and that is the coolest thing wow

DUUUUDE this is a huge fucking deal honestly

let-them-eat-vag:

ashoutintothevoid:

Emma Sulkowicz is on the cover of this month’s New York Magazine and that is the coolest thing wow

DUUUUDE this is a huge fucking deal honestly

(via e-staffs)

radgoku:

please be stoked for your friends when they’ve accomplished something that they worked really hard at even if it’s the most boring ass thing your eyeballs have ever witnessed please please please for their sake just pretend to be excited

(via naturalshocks)

merrymallard:

This duck has no sense of self.  Actually, I doubt that’s true.  I view this duck as the most normative, and I have a hard time relating to people who are super normative.  This is the kind of duck that’s all excited to get her pumpkin spice latte and doesn’t need feminism because she really likes married life and the PTA and is totally missing the concept of not only feminism but really everything.  I think it’s that the rainbow dots are applied so minimalistically that they can be viewed as ‘whimsy’ without going over the  top.  But if you’re over the top, just go over the top.  Don’t spend a lot of time worrying about whether or not it’s ‘too much’ if it makes you happy.  But no one told this duck.
And then I think that my feelings about this duck are over the top and should be scaled down and I have to go through the internal debate of what do I stand for and what am I doing, and it’s just easier to avert my eyes and look at my other ducks.

merrymallard:

This duck has no sense of self.  Actually, I doubt that’s true.  I view this duck as the most normative, and I have a hard time relating to people who are super normative.  This is the kind of duck that’s all excited to get her pumpkin spice latte and doesn’t need feminism because she really likes married life and the PTA and is totally missing the concept of not only feminism but really everything.  I think it’s that the rainbow dots are applied so minimalistically that they can be viewed as ‘whimsy’ without going over the  top.  But if you’re over the top, just go over the top.  Don’t spend a lot of time worrying about whether or not it’s ‘too much’ if it makes you happy.  But no one told this duck.

And then I think that my feelings about this duck are over the top and should be scaled down and I have to go through the internal debate of what do I stand for and what am I doing, and it’s just easier to avert my eyes and look at my other ducks.

Dear Piper Center,

Read More

“I’m adding ‘gin’ as a snack in my food diary.”

Bailey

mylifeaskriz:

ruineshumaines:

Liz Climo on Tumblr.

this really cheered me up

(via a-very-musical-ham)